Trump Fires Back: America’s New Mineral War With China

Trump Fires Back: America’s New Mineral War With China

The U.S. is launching a bold industrial strategy to counter China’s grip on critical minerals, emphasizing domestic mining, federal investment, and supply chain independence as national security priorities.

The message coming out of Oklahoma City wasn’t subtle. In a rare moment of clarity on industrial strategy, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum threw down the gauntlet: “It’s not just drill, baby, drill. It’s mine, baby, mine.”

That line isn’t just for applause. It’s a full-throttle signal that the Trump administration is preparing to invest directly into American mining and mineral processing. Not just to compete—but to fight back. The target? China’s stranglehold on critical minerals.

What’s At Stake

Critical minerals aren’t luxury goods. They’re foundational to defense systems, electric vehicles, semiconductors, satellites, renewable energy, and every lithium-ion battery out there. China has been using its dominance in this arena like a crowbar against U.S. supply chains.

Breakdown of U.S. Dependence

Burgum made the stakes explicit: “If we don’t mine, we will not be successful. We will literally be at the mercy of others that are controlling our supply chains.”

The Trigger: China’s Export Curbs

Beijing slapped new export controls on rare earth elements this month—an aggressive counter-move to President Trump’s increased tariffs on Chinese-made goods. These aren’t obscure metals. They’re used in:

  • Military drones
  • Missile systems
  • Battery-powered vehicles
  • Consumer electronics

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, rare earths are a “single point of failure” for entire industries. That’s not just a supply chain issue. That’s national security on the ropes.

Mineral Supply Risk Analysis for the 2022 List of Critical Minerals Infographic
Mineral Supply Risk Analysis for the 2022 List of Critical MineralsThe USGS leads the government in developing the List of Critical Minerals, using a data-driven methodology to assess mineral supply risk.Critical minerals are essential the Nation’s economy and security, and have supply chains vulnerable to disruption. MethodologyData is ingested into supply risk factors, which are used to assess supply risk. These three factors contribute to a mineral’s supply risk score. For minerals with limited data, these are assessed qualitatively based on available data:DISRUPTION POTENTIAL: How concentrated is mineral produced in countries that have a low willingness or ability to supply to the U.S.?Calculated from:’% of global production concentrated in a countryHow willing or able (ie. due to political or economic stability) each country is to supply the U.S. ECONOMIC VULNERABILITY: How important is the commodity to the economic health of American industries?How much each industry spends on a commodity relative to profitHow much each industry contributes to GDPTRADE EXPOSURE: How reliant is the U.S. on other countries for the mineral commodity?How much commodity the U.S. consumesHow much commodity the U.S. imports Minerals with a single point of failure are considered to have high supply risk:SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE: Is the commodity produced domestically, but by only one producer?All minerals on the List of Critical Minerals:Have a critically high quantitative supply risk scoreWere assessed qualitatively to have a high supply risk based on available dataORHave a single point of failure in their supply chain
United States Critical Minerals Locations
Known Mineral Locations in the United States.

Trump’s Three-Part Counterattack

1. Equity Investment in Miners

Forget loan guarantees. Trump wants the federal government to take equity stakes in U.S.-based mining and processing companies. This isn’t just funding—it’s ownership. It’s the kind of state-involved capitalism the U.S. hasn’t flexed since World War II.

“We should be taking some of our balance sheet and making investments,” Burgum said.

2. Sovereign Risk Insurance Fund

Political instability has crushed more than one mining venture. To stop future administrations from pulling the plug on projects via executive order, Trump wants a federally backed insurance mechanism. Cancel the project? The government writes a check to cover the loss.

“You got to write a check,” Burgum said. “There’s got to be a financial cost if you’re destroying a company’s opportunity.”

3. National Mineral Stockpile

Back in Cold War days, the U.S. had a $50 billion stash of critical materials. Today? Less than $1 billion. Trump wants to rebuild the stockpile—and use it tactically. When China crashes global prices by flooding the market, the U.S. buys. Stockpile cheap. Stabilize demand. Hit back.

Strategic Response Summary

Fallout: Industry on Edge

The export controls have set off alarms across federal agencies. Reports indicate some companies are down to just 40 to 60 days of mineral reserves. No rare earths, no semiconductors. No batteries. No drones.

Industry is scrambling for alternatives, but it’s not a simple pivot. These minerals require long-term infrastructure and high-risk capital. And China knows it.

Jade Lake in northwestern China. Because of the minerals in the water, the lake takes on different hues. (Whminerals/Xinhua News Agency/Getty Images)
“This is fast emerging as our Achilles’ heel,” said Ashley Zumwalt-Forbes, a former energy official. “Oftentimes one of these materials is a single point of failure.”

Bigger Picture: A Structural Play, Not a Quick Fix

The administration is well aware this isn’t a one-quarter earnings story. Building new supply chains takes 10 to 15 years, according to Cove Capital CEO Pini Althaus. But Trump’s team is positioning this as the long game. The aim: a structural decoupling from China’s mineral dominance.

0:00
/7:08
“This administration is trying to find every domestic and allied mining project they can back,” said Gracelin Baskaran from the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The strategy is to throw weight—diplomatic, fiscal, industrial—behind any project that breaks the bottleneck.

China’s Hand: Weaponized Trade

This isn’t the first time China’s used minerals as leverage. In 2010, a dispute with Japan over fishing rights led to a total rare earth export ban. The ripple effects were immediate: supply crunches, manufacturing slowdowns, geopolitical fallout.

China knows how to use minerals like economic sanctions. And now, it’s doing it again.

“They feel they can do significant harm to U.S. manufacturing,” said Cornell economist Eswar Prasad. “That is the choke point.”

This is Another Game Changer in Policy

For years, U.S. manufacturers have lobbied against restrictions that would have forced them to localize supply. Why? Profit margins. Pollution. Complexity. But that comfort is gone. What’s left is urgency. Companies are now calling up every non-Chinese supplier they can find.

Europe’s also feeling the squeeze. Their own projections show an impending shortfall. They’re scrambling too—looking for new deals, partnerships, and supply chains before the trap fully snaps shut.

Join the Largest Online Community of Resource Investors - Apes Hold; Banks Fold.

Critical Minerals Are In Every Nations Sights

This isn’t just policy theater. This is an industrial pivot—one that could define the next decade of U.S. economic security. Whether the U.S. can move fast enough to matter remains to be seen.

But the signal’s clear: the U.S. is getting back in the game, not with sanctions, but with ownership, stockpiles, and sovereign insurance. The minerals war is on. And this time, America’s bringing a checkbook to the gunfight.

Share This Article

Post Comments